TECHNICAL PROGRAMME | Energy Technologies – Future Pathways
Through a mixed-methods approach—including case studies, semi-structured interviews, and document analysis—the research identifies systemic inefficiencies in current waste management systems. For instance, BRICS nations exhibit alarmingly low recycling rates (e.g., 1–8% for construction waste), with most materials ending up in landfills or illegally dumped. Challenges such as inadequate regulatory frameworks, outdated technologies, and fragmented stakeholder collaboration hinder progress toward circularity. The paper proposes a Circular Economy Process Model (CEPM) tailored to oil and gas construction, emphasizing lifecycle integration, stakeholder engagement, and adaptive policies. Key strategies include adopting modular design, promoting recycled materials in infrastructure, incentivizing waste-to-energy technologies, and strengthening institutional frameworks for waste valorization.
Theoretical contributions highlight the integration of systems theory, life cycle assessment (LCA), and industrial ecology to reframe construction practices. Practically, the study offers actionable insights for policymakers and industry stakeholders, such as implementing circular procurement policies, advancing digital tools for waste tracking, and fostering cross-sector partnerships. Future applications of the CEPM could extend to other resource-intensive industries, supporting global sustainability goals.
By bridging the gap between developed and emerging economies, this research underscores the urgency of transitioning to circular practices in oil and gas construction. It provides a roadmap for reducing environmental footprints, optimizing resource use, and aligning the sector with international sustainability targets, such as the UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Ultimately, the study advocates for systemic innovation, policy coherence, and stakeholder-driven governance to achieve a resilient, low-carbon, and circular construction ecosystem in emerging markets.
Keywords: Circular economy; Construction waste management; Oil and gas projects; Sustainability; BRICS nations; Lifecycle assessment; Policy innovation.
The analysis first delineates the “well–gathering station–processing plant–pipeline network” system boundary. An LCA model constructed in SimaPro quantifies Global Warming Potential (GWP), Human Toxicity Potential (HTP) and Abiotic Depletion Potential for Elements (ADPE). These metrics are paired with an LCCA-based economic appraisal to devise phase-specific optimisation strategies for construction, operation and decommissioning. An "Environmental-Cost-Technical" multi-objective decision model is then established. Subjective weights are obtained with the Triangular Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (TFAHP); objective weights are derived with the Criteria Importance Through Intercriteria Correlation (CRITIC) method; and composite weights are calculated by minimum-deviation estimation. The Multiple-Attribute Boundary Approximation area Comparison (MABAC) method is finally used to rank alternative surface-engineering schemes.
Applying the framework to the Sulige gas field shows that the optimal configuration is “downhole throttling, multi-well manifolding, wet-gas transmission, two-stage compression, centralised processing”. During construction, integrated skid-mounted equipment cuts GWP key-factor emissions by 6.8% and HTP risk by 22.5%; in operation, green-power drives and VOC recovery reduce GWP key-factor emissions by 27.4%, HTP risk by 31.9% and ADPE consumption by 9.5%; at decommissioning, a standard steel-recycling system achieves an 80% steel recovery rate.
By quantifying environmental and economic impacts through coupled LCA-LCCA and embedding them in a fuzzy MCDA framework that addresses life-cycle cost and technical feasibility, this study offers a replicable pathway for the sustainable development of surface facilities in tight gas fields.
Yerzhan Abylkhanov
Chair
Oil and Gas Production Department Director
KazMunaiGas National Oil & Gas Company
Kazakhstan
Xiaoxiao Liu
Vice Chair
Vice Chief Engineer
SINOPEC Economics & Development Research Institute Company Limited
China
Salisu Isihak
Vice Chair
Senior Technical Assistant to the Managing Director, NNPC Retail,
Nigerian National Petroleum Company Ltd.
Nigeria
Bo Feng
Speaker
Deputy Director
Changqing Engineering Design Co., Ltd., Changqing Oilfield, China National Petroleum Corporation (CNPC)
China
The analysis first delineates the “well–gathering station–processing plant–pipeline network” system boundary. An LCA model constructed in SimaPro quantifies Global Warming Potential (GWP), Human Toxicity Potential (HTP) and Abiotic Depletion Potential for Elements (ADPE). These metrics are paired with an LCCA-based economic appraisal to devise phase-specific optimisation strategies for construction, operation and decommissioning. An "Environmental-Cost-Technical" multi-objective decision model is then established. Subjective weights are obtained with the Triangular Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (TFAHP); objective weights are derived with the Criteria Importance Through Intercriteria Correlation (CRITIC) method; and composite weights are calculated by minimum-deviation estimation. The Multiple-Attribute Boundary Approximation area Comparison (MABAC) method is finally used to rank alternative surface-engineering schemes.
Applying the framework to the Sulige gas field shows that the optimal configuration is “downhole throttling, multi-well manifolding, wet-gas transmission, two-stage compression, centralised processing”. During construction, integrated skid-mounted equipment cuts GWP key-factor emissions by 6.8% and HTP risk by 22.5%; in operation, green-power drives and VOC recovery reduce GWP key-factor emissions by 27.4%, HTP risk by 31.9% and ADPE consumption by 9.5%; at decommissioning, a standard steel-recycling system achieves an 80% steel recovery rate.
By quantifying environmental and economic impacts through coupled LCA-LCCA and embedding them in a fuzzy MCDA framework that addresses life-cycle cost and technical feasibility, this study offers a replicable pathway for the sustainable development of surface facilities in tight gas fields.
Kurmanbek Yeshmagambetov
Speaker
Head of Standarts and Innovation Department
KazTransOil JSC
Kazakhstan
Through a mixed-methods approach—including case studies, semi-structured interviews, and document analysis—the research identifies systemic inefficiencies in current waste management systems. For instance, BRICS nations exhibit alarmingly low recycling rates (e.g., 1–8% for construction waste), with most materials ending up in landfills or illegally dumped. Challenges such as inadequate regulatory frameworks, outdated technologies, and fragmented stakeholder collaboration hinder progress toward circularity. The paper proposes a Circular Economy Process Model (CEPM) tailored to oil and gas construction, emphasizing lifecycle integration, stakeholder engagement, and adaptive policies. Key strategies include adopting modular design, promoting recycled materials in infrastructure, incentivizing waste-to-energy technologies, and strengthening institutional frameworks for waste valorization.
Theoretical contributions highlight the integration of systems theory, life cycle assessment (LCA), and industrial ecology to reframe construction practices. Practically, the study offers actionable insights for policymakers and industry stakeholders, such as implementing circular procurement policies, advancing digital tools for waste tracking, and fostering cross-sector partnerships. Future applications of the CEPM could extend to other resource-intensive industries, supporting global sustainability goals.
By bridging the gap between developed and emerging economies, this research underscores the urgency of transitioning to circular practices in oil and gas construction. It provides a roadmap for reducing environmental footprints, optimizing resource use, and aligning the sector with international sustainability targets, such as the UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Ultimately, the study advocates for systemic innovation, policy coherence, and stakeholder-driven governance to achieve a resilient, low-carbon, and circular construction ecosystem in emerging markets.
Keywords: Circular economy; Construction waste management; Oil and gas projects; Sustainability; BRICS nations; Lifecycle assessment; Policy innovation.
Wenjia Xu
Speaker
Senior Engineer
CNPC Research Institute of Safety & Environment Technology
China





